|
Save Camphill responds
to leak of Hogg report
January 28, 2005
Responding to leaked news of Professor
Hogg's interim report on the impact of the AWPR on the Camphill
special needs communities, Save Camphill welcomes its conclusion
that further detailed research is required to assess the full effect
the proposed route would have.
This finding concurs with the recent preliminary
report commissioned by Save Camphill and conducted by the internationally
recognised expert on disability and quality of life, Professor Roy
Brown.
"We have only just received copies of Professor
Hogg's report," Dr Stefan Geider, the Camphill Medical Officer
points out, "so it is too early for us to make a detailed response.
However, we welcome the fact that Professor Hogg agrees that further
and more detailed studies are essential.
"It is also important to recognise that Professor
Hogg's report restricts itself to examining the psychological aspects
of the proposed routing.
"Even from that narrow perspective, Professor
Hogg concludes that there is a high risk of detrimental effects
on the special needs children in our care - specifically during
the construction phase, which is estimated to last well over a year.
Indeed, Professor Hogg's report questions if the school could actually
remain open during that period.
"The Camphill communities have a legal responsibility
to look after the well being of the 200 vulnerable adults and children
in the Camphill Newton Dee community and Camphill Rudolf Steiner
Schools. Professor Hogg's report confirms there is risk of damage
to these communities and for the individual special needs residents
and pupils.
"Given that a decision to drive a road through
Camphill is irreversible, we believe that risk cannot be contemplated
in view of the potentially catastrophic damage that this routing
could cause for the communities and the special needs individuals
for whom Camphill is home.
"While Save Camphill is not opposed to the development
of an Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, we must continue use all
legal means at our disposal to carry forward our 11-year objection
to the detailed routing that threatens 65 years of work that inspires
the international Camphill Movement.
"Camphill also has no desire to delay the road.
Indeed, that is one reason why Camphill formally objected to this
routing in November 1993 - more than 11 years ago. It is also one
reason why we have been urging the authorities to back up their
research into the wildlife effects of this route with research into
the human impact.
"Like Professor Brown, we are bound to
question why this research appears to have been almost an afterthought,
starting just months before opening of public consultation."
Click
here for more information from Grampian TV
«back
|